Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content
- From: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:21:18 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4AD64EDE.3060001@debian.org>
- Reply-to: pmatthaei@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <slrnhdcj5t.5j4.trash@kelgar.0x539.de>
- References: <20091013142402.14365.94643.reportbug@rincewind.suse.cz> <20091013155801.GA4050@entrouvert.com> <20091013214438.0e264427@raptor> <200910140914.02344.russell@coker.com.au> <20091014101256.5c125380@rincewind.suse.cz> <87fx9lyith.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20091014190307.0892decf.codehelp@debian.org> <20091014183014.GA3084@lisa> <20091014185248.GC19270@nabiki.intranet.nul-unu.com> <87k4yxeplv.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4AD62A80.3040202@debian.org> <87vdihzq5n.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <slrnhdcj5t.5j4.trash@kelgar.0x539.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Kern schrieb:
> On 2009-10-14, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
>>> But also if the _free_ software is for downloading etc. pay-only content
>>> like music, I do not think that it has to enter contrib, because it does
>>> not has got a real dependenie on non-free stuff.
>> Yeah, it's a bit of a marginal case. We have, for instance, Perl modules
>> to talk to the Amazon APIs in main, although in most of those cases the
>> API is relatively open and some other sites also implement it.
>
> The appearance of Eucalyptus is pretty recent, though. So you'd need to
> wait until a free service of an API gets released? How feature complete
> does it need to be? If I release a "compliant" porn directory with only one
> pic, would that be appropriate? And I could easily make it non-porn too.
>
> zsnes used to be in contrib, but somebody made the case that there could
> be, in fact, free roms, because the way how to program the box is not
> exactly secret anymore. (If they would be buildable on Debian is another
> question.) It lives in main now and my gut feeling is that it's the right
> thing to do, given that the code base is free to modify, share and gives
> you the usual rights of a free software license (here: GPL2).
Please move this whole discussion to debian-legal now.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
patrick@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrWTt0ACgkQ2XA5inpabMfMkgCZAa1TyfmAqpzQN+I15vl2pohe
5lEAni039ylmJ95ylOC3RWVX/hmGnHJU
=JCXs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: