debian-legal Sep 2007 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

ajdlinux

Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 19
Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 20
Re: Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...) Sep 15
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 15

Alessandro Rubini

Re: Doubts regarding the GPLv(2,3) compatibility of libpcap Sep 16

Andrew Donnellan

Re: SIM-IM uses default ICQ sounds Sep 11
Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 06
CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...) Sep 13

Anthony Towns

Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 18
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11

Arnoud Engelfriet

Re: Licensing of iso-codes Sep 10
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 14
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 03
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: SIM-IM uses default ICQ sounds Sep 12

Ben Finney

Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 17
Re: Which GPL for Ogg Frog? Sep 30
Re: Bug#442032: CPAL Sep 15
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 20
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 27
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 20
Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 05
Re: package astrolog Sep 27
Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 05
Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 04
Re: License Question Sep 21
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 18
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 25
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 20
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 25
Re: package astrolog Sep 26
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Which GPL for Ogg Frog? Sep 27
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 04
Re: Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 07
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 03
Re: Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 07
Re: Bacula and OpenSSL Sep 25
Re: Licensing a work using a GPL-ed library under the LGPL Sep 02
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 24

Bernhard R. Link

Re: Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 07

curvy

curwillet cury cuscobark Sep 21

Damyan Ivanov

Advise about missing copyright info Sep 18

Dominique Dumont

Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 18

Don Armstrong

Re: Debian WWW use OPL - which is declared non-DFSG free? Sep 08
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07

Florian Weimer

Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 22
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 24
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 03
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 24

Francesco Poli

Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 24
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Debian WWW use OPL - which is declared non-DFSG free? Sep 08
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 25
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 15
Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 08
Re: Debian logo [was : Open Publication License / GPL / FDL] Sep 18
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 02
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 14
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Which GPL for Ogg Frog? Sep 27
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 25
Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 06
Last call draft of AGPL v3 Sep 03
A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 05
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 03
Re: Advise about missing copyright info Sep 26
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 02
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses) Sep 13
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 08
Re: Licensing a work using a GPL-ed library under the LGPL Sep 02

Freek Dijkstra

Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses) Sep 13
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 13
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11

Geoffroy

Debian logo [was : Open Publication License / GPL / FDL] Sep 17

Giacomo A. Catenazzi

Re: Licensing of iso-codes Sep 10
Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 06

halfrussian

halfsemitic halfspanish halfa Sep 21

Imran Kazmi

Meeting Update Sep 16
Meeting Update Sep 16

Jari Aalto

Debian WWW use OPL - which is declared non-DFSG free? Sep 08

Jeff Licquia

Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Re: Using Debian as a base for a LiveCD together with non-free products. Sep 13
Re: Using Debian as a base for a LiveCD together with non-free products. Sep 12
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05

Jenner Fusari

Re: Using Debian as a base for a LiveCD together with non-free products. Sep 13
Using Debian as a base for a LiveCD together with non-free products. Sep 12

Jens Peter Secher

Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 08

Joe Smith

Re: unauthorized use of debian logo? Sep 01
Re: Which GPL for Ogg Frog? Sep 30
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 22

Joerg Mayer

Doubts regarding the GPLv(2,3) compatibility of libpcap Sep 14

jonathon

CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses) Sep 13

Joseph Hunt

r u ready 2 stop living paycheck to paycheck? Sep 26

Joseph Neal

SIM-IM uses default ICQ sounds Sep 11

Josselin Mouette

Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 22
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 05
Re: Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 06
Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 07
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 20
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 22
Re: Bacula and OpenSSL Sep 25
Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b Sep 06
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 03
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 03
Re: Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 06

Ken Arromdee

Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 08

Kern Sibbald

Kumar Appaiah

Re: JFTP icon freeness (Was: A license question) Sep 10
A license question Sep 09

Laurent Chretienneau

Re: Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...) Sep 14

Leopold Palomo Avellaneda

Re: Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 06
Monkey's Audio License Agreement Sep 06

Manoj Srivastava

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...) Sep 27

Marc O'Brien

Re: Bug#442032: CPAL Sep 28

Marco d'Itri

Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 05
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 05
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 02
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 03
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 01

Matthew Johnson

Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme (was: Anti-TPM clauses) Sep 13

Michael Poole

Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05

MJ Ray

Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 09
Re: Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...) Sep 14
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 23
Re: Bacula and OpenSSL Sep 26
Re: Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...) Sep 15
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 02
Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 20

Moritz Muehlenhoff

Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 11

Olive

Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 15
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 15
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Doubts regarding the GPLv(2,3) compatibility of libpcap Sep 14
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 13
Re: Bug#442032: CPAL Sep 15
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Licensing of iso-codes Sep 13

Paul Wise

Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 08

Peter Rock

elilo-installer copyright status Sep 28

Peter S Galbraith

Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 04
Re: Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 04
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 04
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 05

Rick Moen

Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 07
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 08
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07
Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 06

Rippit the Ogg Frog

Which GPL for Ogg Frog? Sep 27

Robert Millan

moonlight Sep 11

Sam Clegg

Re: perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 18
perforce SCM licensing issues Sep 17

Shane Martin Coughlan

Re: Bacula and OpenSSL Sep 25
Re: Bacula and OpenSSL Sep 24

Shriramana Sharma

Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 02
Re: Licensing a work using a GPL-ed library under the LGPL Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Licensing a work using a GPL-ed library under the LGPL Sep 02
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 06
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 12

Soeren Sonnenburg

Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 08
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 03
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 01
DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 01
Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses Sep 08

Stefano Zacchiroli

Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 22
is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 20
Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free? Sep 21

Stephen Gran

Re: Bacula and OpenSSL Sep 24

Steve King

Re: Bug#431883: dcraw license does not give permission to distribute modified versions or source alongside Sep 14

Steve Langasek

Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 09
Re: elilo-installer copyright status Sep 28
Re: CC Non-waivable Compulsory License Scheme Sep 14
Re: Anti-TPM clauses Sep 11
Re: Using a CC-3.0-BY file as data file for a GPL program Sep 03
Re: Trademark scope (just for the record) Sep 07

Tatsuya Kinoshita

Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 04

Thanasis Kinias

package astrolog Sep 25
Re: package astrolog Sep 26

Tobi

GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 04
Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 05
Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 05
Re: GPL2 vs. GPL3 issue in VDR plug-in packages Sep 05

Tobias Toedter

Licensing of iso-codes Sep 10

Wesley J. Landaker

Re: SIM-IM uses default ICQ sounds Sep 12
Re: Bug#431883: dcraw license does not give permission to distribute modified versions or source alongside Sep 14
Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3 Sep 04
Re: JFTP icon freeness (Was: A license question) Sep 09

The last update was on 15:32 GMT Thu Mar 09. There are 245 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc