All:
Thanks to the comments here [1] (and also [2] [3] [4]) we have
worked to incorporate your feedback to further clarify
the intent of the DLJ.
We have made an updated revision to the DLJ FAQ (now version 1.2)
which is publicly available at [5]. The preamble to the FAQ
has been specifically re-written to clarify the relationship
between the FAQ and the license itself.
For further questions regarding intent please followup here
or in the jdk-distros Forum [3].
Regards,
--Tom
[1] debian-legal
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/05/threads.htm
[2] jpackage-discuss
https://www.zarb.org/pipermail/jpackage-discuss/2006-May/thread.html
[3] jdk-distros Forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
[4] The DLJfeedback@sun.com alias
[5] https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature