On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say,
the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code a lot better
IMO). To have the license require distribution of PHP is a little
odd. What I'm a tad more confused about is why anyone would maintain
their packages through apt instead of pear.
pear upgrade Package_Name
- or -
pear upgrade-all
Translates about as well as "apt-get install php4-pear-package-name"
I would think.