Re: Correct license

["Michael K. Edwards" <m.k.edwards@gmail.com>]

On 7/15/05, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> This clause resembles the extended copyleft provisions of the Affero
> General Public License.  Has debian-legal reached consensus on that
> license?

For my own part, two words:  Idiotic.  Non-free.

(Gratuitously non-GPL-compatible, discriminates against embedded
developers, effectively ties the program to today's network plumbing
and demands that users open themselves wide to DDoS attacks.)

Cheers,
- Michael
(IANADD, IANAL, TINLA)