Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 18:49, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> The patent non-policy should not be used as a precedent. It's there
> until the software patent issue goes away in one direction or another
> -- the current situation is not tenable for the years to come. It's
> not something anybody should be proud of or enjoy doing, but it's the
> only way to have *any* software right now.
Sigh. Yes. But the difference between the two makes no practical
difference whatsoever to our users at present, so what's the point?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>