[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian 7.7 - laptop - dconf - changes not accepted



Hi,

I'm having a similar problem only a bit worse : the computer is
completely unresponsive after suspending when closing the lid, no
reboot, no response to the keys (kill X11 or trying to reboot with
ctrl-alt-delete don't work) No way to cleanly stop it !!!

I found this:

http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/linux-suspendresume-regression-in-debian-78.html

Apparently a fix is in the way, I hope it gets ready soon. In the
meantime I cannot close the lid of the laptop (Dell Latitude E6520)

After many years of happy work with Debian I'm considering looking for
another distro... This is the second suspend/halt problem I have hit in
few weeks. The other one, in another laptop, with a non-halt problem
after Debian testing switched to systemd is still not solved
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-laptop/2014/12/msg00018.html). I
understand the difficulties of developing OSs (especially in a testing
distro) and I will be ready to come back to Debian as soon as these are
solved, but I consider this behaviour quite un-Debian and somehow
deceiving from a "universal operating system".

Cheers,

   Miguel

Le 13/01/2015 09:07, Ulrich Haas a écrit :
> Dear all,
> I am using debian 7.7 on a lenovo laptop. I assume that after the latest
> security-updates in january 2015 - DSA-3125 openssl und DSA-3124 otrs2
> -, the laptop changed the behavior when close and open the lid.
> 
> Now, after a couple of time of working with it, I closed the lid for a
> pause. After the pause, when open the lid again, the laptop starts from
> scratch, but I did not shot it down before.
> 
> Tried to change the settings in dconf-editor:
> dconf-editor/org/gnome/settings-demon/plugins/power/lid-close-ac-action/ .. default = suspsend
> 
> The action to change the default 'suspend' to 'blank' was not accepted.
> 
> Other changes in dconfig, like ...lid-close-battery-action could be
> changed from 'suspend' to 'blank'.
> 
> What could I do?
> 
> thanks in advacde
> ulrich
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply to: