Carl Fink wrote: > My point is that the terminology could be improved ... Let's go with that for a moment. What would it be called instead? It is all very well and good to say that something is bad. Lots of things are bad. But if it is to be improved then it must have an improvement available. What would be the improvement in this case? And I must note that with a signature line prominently displaying your email address of nitpicking@nitpicking.com and your blog there (good reading by the way) this type of discussion seems very much appropriate. :-) Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature