[DONE] wml://{security/2016/dsa-3707.wml}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- --- english/security/2016/dsa-3707.wml 2016-11-08 00:03:11.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2016/dsa-3707.wml 2016-11-08 01:39:27.629641953 +0500
@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an
- -implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in breakouts
- -of the Java sandbox or denial of service.</p>
+<p>Ð? OpenJDK, Ñ?еализаÑ?ии плаÑ?Ñ?оÑ?мÑ? Oracle Java, бÑ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено
+неÑ?колÑ?ко Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?ей, пÑ?иводÑ?Ñ?иÑ? к вÑ?Ñ?одÑ? из
+пеÑ?оÑ?ниÑ?Ñ? Java или оÑ?казам в обÑ?лÑ?живании.</p>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 7u111-2.6.7-2~deb8u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (jessie) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 7u111-2.6.7-2~deb8u1.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-7 packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? openjdk-7.</p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=HzXW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: