[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [LCFC] templates://wvdial/{wvdial.templates}



On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:25:42PM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote:
> > So we could say "... and configure the modem(s)?" - Justin, does "the" need
> > dropping there? and Christian, is there a status quo on using "(s)"?
> 
> It gets ugly in languages with more extensive number-marking - "le(s)
> modem(s) ADSL compatible(s)"...

Ah yes, as a former student of French that should have been obvious.

> Multi-modem setups are probably uncommon enough that we can just cover
> it in the long description with s/modem/modem (or modems)/ at most.

Ack; other questions in the template *imply* a single modem too, although
actually they are modem-agnostic, so I think it makes most sense to leave
it as before.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: