Control: tag -1 help On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 13:35:09 CEST Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >So I'm inclined to think that 92833e8b5db6c209e9311ac8c6a44d3bf1856659 is > >the commit which brought the bug back. > > Yes, definitely. The lines… > > if (!qdisc) > return; > > … from near the beginning of the now-static qdisc_destroy must > be moved to the beginning of the new qdisc_put function. Agreed. That would make it in line with 'master' and 'linux-5.10.y'. In branch 'linux-4.9.y' there is no qdisc_put function, so the above check seems rightly in qdisc_destroy there. This should be reported upstream, but I don't know what the best cq appropriate way to do that, so I'm referring that to the actual Debian maintainers, hence the 'help' tag.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.