Sorry for confusion, I believed I did posted a notification here;
probably got some email issues. Great that everything got tracked,
finally. Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 14:58 +0400, Alexander Myodov wrote:Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.30-6 Severity: normal After I migrated my Lenovo X61 Tablet laptop running squeeze from latest 2.6.26 kernel to 2.6.30 kernel, the wake-up process after Suspend-To-Ram (by closing the lid) with about 1/2 probability ends in re-Suspend. That is: I open the lid, the laptop wakes up, the screen changes to text mode, several error lines are printed, and in a second it goes STR again. If, after that, with the lid open, I press the power button to wake it up again, it wakes up properly. I managed to shot the error lines which are printed before the laptop suspends. Each line contain some kind of timestamp; I am printing it for the first line and changing it to xxxxx.xxxxxx for the next lines. If for some reason you need the exact photo (instead of my retype which may contain mistypes), please request it:I found that you also reported this at <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14100>. Thanks for doing that, as I was going to suggest you do so, but in future please send the upstream bug number or URL to the Debian bug report so we can track it. Ben. |
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 544169@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#544169: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: linux-kernel 2.6.30 regression to 2.6.26 - re-suspend on wakeup.
- From: "maa_public@sinn.ru" <maa_public@sinn.ru>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:44:21 +0400
- Message-id: <4A9BFDE5.9060008@sinn.ru>
- In-reply-to: <20090831094640.GP13440@baikonur.stro.at>
- References: <20090829105814.22176.5067.reportbug@hunny-lap.net.local> <20090830004042.GK13440@baikonur.stro.at> <4A9B95A9.9000809@sinn.ru> <20090831094640.GP13440@baikonur.stro.at>
Done; http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14100 raised.
I am not much into the kernel/C development myself, so I am unfortunately unable to explain the issue on the "devspeak", or do the preliminary analysis myself. Though anybody feel free to contact me directly if I can help with investigating this issue.
maximilian attems wrote:On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:19:37PM +0400, maa_public@sinn.ru wrote:Quite the same with 2.6.31-rc6as it is reproducible with allmost latest upstream, please submit on bugzilla.kernel.org so that upstream devs get notified and let us know of the upstream bug nr. thanks
--- End Message ---