Re: Bug#411692: bootchart-view: Needs libgtkpeer.so when converting a bootchart to EPS or PNG format
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#411692: bootchart-view: Needs libgtkpeer.so when converting a bootchart to EPS or PNG format
- From: Andrew Vaughan <ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:40:08 +1100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200703112040.09280.ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>
- In-reply-to: <17888.18208.629896.308421@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
- References: <20070220140456.11600.65871.reportbug@iridal.phys.oi> <20070224124301.GD30546@alea.gnuu.de> <17888.18208.629896.308421@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Sunday 25 February 2007 01:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jörg Sommer writes:
> > Hi Java team,
> >
> > I've got a bug report that libgtkpeer.so is missing if gcj-4.1 is used.
> >
> > IMO this is a bug in gcj. kaffe and sablevm provide through
> > dependencies the file libgtkpeer.so.
>
> This is done by intent, so you are able to run java apps without
> graphical ui's on machines which don't have gtk and X installed.
>
> What is missing (and fixed and gcc svn) is a missing recommends on
> libgcj7-awt in the libgcj7-0 or gij-4.1 packages (however gij already
> recommends libgcj7-awt).
>
> > kaffe -> kaffe-pthreads | kaffe-jthreads -- both ship libgtkpeer.so
> > sablevm -> libsablevm1 -> libsablevm-native1
> >
> > Where is the bug? Must the bootchart-view package depend on libgcj7-awt
> > or classpath-gtkpeer?
>
> yes, maybe we should introduce a new virtual package
> java-runtime-with-ui, which is provided by the packages above.
>
> Matthias
Personally, as a user, I would prefer a -nox package. This is consistent
with other packages that have gui and -nox versions. It also follows the
principle of least surprise by allowing the java-runtime packages to
provide the same java environment as the Sun binary packages.
Andrew
Reply to: