Re: java-common and registry
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:25:34PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives.
> Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be
> possible to include the registry stuff along with it?
Well it is a possibility. There will probably be more uploads after
that too.
> *flutters eyelids*
>
> I can write drafts for the appropriate policy changes if desired.
Of course. It is a proposal that I want to have commented, changed,
updated, fixed, added new features to, etc. :)
> My only question would be whether the registry files should be conffiles,
> i.e. in /etc/java/registry instead of /usr/share/java/registry?
Conffiles might be good yes.
Regards,
// Ola
> Ben.
>
> --
>
> Ben Burton
> benb@acm.org | bab@debian.org
> http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/
> Public Key: finger bab@debian.org
>
> The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals, and 362 to
> heterosexuals. This doesn't mean God doesn't love heterosexuals, it's
> just that they need more supervision.
> - Lynn Lavner
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: