Re: SNMP

To: Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-isp debian <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>, debian-isp debian <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: SNMP
From: Andrew Miehs <andrew@2sheds.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:28:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 0753D11D-4F98-4D5C-A29B-67D71000F5D7@2sheds.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 49CDF54B.5000808@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 49C8BF21.3020600@pangea.org> <[🔎] 49CA1FE2.8080109@gmail.com> <[🔎] 1237985972.7338.161.camel@jwinder-workstation> <[🔎] 49CA44D9.7080006@gmail.com> <[🔎] 1238002546.7338.172.camel@jwinder-workstation> <[🔎] 49CCE1D9.6000403@gmail.com> <[🔎] 49CDEE07.3030402@elib.minfin.bg> <[🔎] 49CDF54B.5000808@gmail.com>



On 28/03/2009, at 11:00 AM, Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com> wrote:

Could you be more specific? I don't see how this thread is relatedto BGP
Boris Pavlov wrote:

If it is a router with a full bgp feed you will end up with a lot ofroutes which you will also hit with your snmpwalk

BGP router?

Alex wrote:

Thanks Jeremy the doc from cisco is great unfortunately when i run
snmpwalk command to find out the physical address the switch CPUruns
100% and i lose conectivity :(
Jeremy Winder wrote:

[cut]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com>

References:
- Maiscanner's quarantine web interface
  - From: Carlos Acedo <carlos@pangea.org>
- SNMP
  - From: Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com>
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Jeremy Winder <jwinder@logicalsi.com>
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com>
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Jeremy Winder <jwinder@logicalsi.com>
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com>
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Boris Pavlov <edi@elib.minfin.bg>
- Re: SNMP
  - From: Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SNMP
Next by Date: Distributed monitoring
Previous by thread: Re: SNMP
Next by thread: Re: SNMP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread