On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 19:25, Julián Muñoz wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > > > Woody is stable for 2 months now! :-) . > > Yes, I know. Sorry for my bad english ;-) (By the way, do you think it's > enough 2 months ?) woody is *released*. No further changes to it will be made, except security fixes, and fixing very grave bugs. Woody had a very long 'beta' testing period - the release was planned much earlier but got delayed. So I would expect even more bugs got fixes than usual. > Well, I would like to evaluate the cost of transition. And also, I'd like > to be sure when to change. Going from potato to woody *is* a major upgrade, sure. Going from 3.0 to 3.0r1 will be very minor, probably on the same level as applying the security upgrades. Besides, 3.0r1 will be just security upgrades and a very small number of additional fixes, so waiting for 3.0r1 is probably not worth it. > > Potato is feature frozen, and I liked this really, because I need > stability, and only fixes for the important bugs. > What about Woody ? > > > See http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ > > Of course we use it. > > Sorry, it is not so obvious to me ! ( Ignorant I am :-) If you have language problems, I hope you noticed that most debian pages are available in many different languages, so it should really be clear. cheers -- vbi -- secure email with gpg http://fortytwo.ch/gpg NOTICE: subkey signature! request key 92082481 from keyserver.kjsl.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part