On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:40:48PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 07:07:06PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:57:41 +0800
> > ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debian.org> wrote:
> > > So do we need to put debian-input-method related packages into this
> > > salsa.d.o/input-method-team? Or just put them in salsa.d.o/debian?
> >
> > It's better to put them into salsa.d.o/input-method-team, IMO
> > as migration.
>
> Well, you didn't speak up previously ... So I thought we are moving to
> debian
>
> This provide wider access by other DDs who are not much into input
> method but can help from KDE/Gnome etc.
I now prefer to put packages into input-method-team instead of debian
for the following reasons:
* People outside input-method-team can easily contribute via PR. In case
[0], Gunnar can contribute to fcitx with only salsa account.
* For non-DD maintainer, they don't have permission for debian by
default, so they need to call DD to help them modifying code, just
like [0]. I am not sure if there is any policy for granting debian
access permission to non-DD, but for input-method-team, we can define
our own rule so that non-DD maintainer can maintain these packages
without any problem.
[0] http://isg.ee.ethz.ch://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcitx/merge_requests/1#note_16204
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debconf,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature