Re: Fwd: Re: ddtp.d.o is not alive
Hi Daniel,
sorry for not being so active the last days, i was on vacation and had
some personal issues. I have registered an alioth project for DDTP,
which is already approoved. For more information please also follow the
thread on -devel.
Greetings
Martin
On Monday, 18 Apr 2005, you wrote:
>
> Hi to all!
>
> Are there in this list persons involved with ddtp? ddtp.debian.org is not
> alive since the problem on gluck. I sent emails to debian-devel list and
> I noted that there are no DD's worry about DDTP.
>
> And here? Is there anybody that account DDTP like a important think to
> debian? Or I'm wasting my time?
>
> I forward below the last reply on the debian-devel list.
>
> Best regards!
>
> --- Mensagem Original ---
> Data: 4/17/2005
> De: "Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
> Assunto: Re: ddtp.d.o is not alive
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:19:44AM -0300, Daniel Mac?do Batista wrote:
> >
> > Any news?
> >
> > Will be solved?
>
> It seems as if no DD is genuinly interested in taking up the ddtp
> project, at least, nobody stepped up yet.
>
> This might have to do with the fact that there is no way decided yet on
> how to propagate those translations to the actual users, and as such, it
> isn't relevant to the upcoming release.
>
> I think it's best to start a discussion after sarge is released how to
> properly implement this. For the time being, it seems to be that it'd be
> better to maintain ddtp for now yourselves on some own host, or on
> alioth, because I don't otherwise see any progress happening soonishly.
> You might by the way also try to ask directly the opinion of the i18n
> mailinglist: http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/, which is much more
> ontopic for your inquiries.
>
> --Jeroen
>
> --
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar
> Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
> http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: