[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ruby1.9.1



On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 23:41 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Oct 2011 18:23:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > With gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.git20110805-1:
> > ...
> > #255 test_io.rb:79:in `<top (required)>' .
> > #256 test_io.rb:99:in `block in <top (required)>' 
> > Hang here!!
> > 
> > With gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.git20111010-1:
> > ...
> > #257 test_io.rb:106:in `<top (required)>' .
> > 
> > test_jump.rb 
> > #258 test_jump.rb:1:in `<top (required)>' .
> > #259 test_jump.rb:20:in `<top (required)>' .
> > ...
> > #300 test_literal.rb:17:in `<top (required)>' 
> > Hang here!
> 
> Is it reproducible in these places exactly?

After the first build with gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.git20111010-1 hanging
at test #300, all further build attempts hang at test #256! So one could
say that the hang is reproducible there.


Reply to: