Hi, Am Montag, den 18.06.2012, 09:59 -0400 schrieb Ryan Kavanagh: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:27:57PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > not at all, feel free to put it in experimental. Maybe use a second > > darcs repo on /darcs/pkg-haskell/experimental/xmonad for that. > > Likewise for xmonad-contrib and haskell-x11? Is it a simple matter of > copying /darcs/pkg-haskell/xmonad to > /darcs/pkg-haskell/experimental/xmonad and updating my local > _darcs/prefs/defaultrepo, or should I follow the "Adding a new package" > procedure on DarcsBasic[0]? I’m not quite sure, apply common sense :-). I think copying and then "darcs push --set-default <newlocation>" is fine. Just make sure that we don’t get commit mails for every patch already in the repo, i.e. Ctrl-C if that happens. > Moreover, what versions should xmonad and xmonad-contrib be? I currently > have 0.10+darcs20120615, although xmonad.cabal says 0.10.1 (this was > never released in tarball form, the darcs log reads: > > Bump version to 0.10.1 since cabal uses hackage dependencies even when > the locally installed package differs. > > ) Should it be 0.10.1+darcs20120615 instead? > > Best wishes, > Ryan better probably is something like 0.11~darcs20120615, at least if we are sure that the next upstream release will be called that way. Otherwise, 0.10+darcs20120615-1 is fine; the cabal version bump is only “debian-internal” not also currently not reflected in the package version. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part