Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.04.2011, 14:34 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:30:17AM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > >Hi Iain. > > > >Excerpts from Iain Lane's message of Qua Abr 13 10:18:36 -0300 2011: > >(...) > >> Even though I'm not quite a DD yet (NM is such a slog), I could still build > >> packages from the transition. I then chuck > >> dsc,{orig,},{diff,debian},_amd64.deb,_amd64.changes up on a server somewhere > >> and a DD downloads, debsigns and uploads. > > > >I think it'll be better if you do the changes in the debian/ directory and push > >the changes to the darcs repository, including a TAG (with debcommit -r) so > >that a DD will download your changes and build the packages. > > I imagined most of the time would be spent in building the packages > (as most of the transition is already done in darcs — am I wrong in > thinking this?). If I'm just adding a tag then I don't think that adds > much value to the process. correct. Thinking about the build order, building, possibly installing for the next build, uploading, all that takes time. Of course there is also that I check for new versions and decide if we want them (e.g. because older do not build against ghc-7, or its required by something else we want to update) or not (e.g. because something wants the older version). If in doubt, I upgrade. For upgrading, there is a script in tools that pushes a version dump to darcs, defaulting to the newest version in Hackage. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part