[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seeking RFS for pat v0.12.0-1



On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:38:55PM -0500, Federico Grau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 01:46:22AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > git checkout upstream
> > git merge --ff upstream/0.12.0
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the feedback Shengjing Zhu,
> 
> I've completed the suggested steps and pushed them to salsa.
> Ready for further review, feedback, or upload as cycles are available.

Hi Federico,

Do you mind also pushing your pristine-tar branch to Salsa?  If you
don't have one, you should be able to run the following command from the
same directory as your git repo - that is the same directory where you
can successfully run gbp buildpackage:

  pristine-tar commit ../build-area/pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.gz

or 

  pristine-tar commit ../tarballs/pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.gz

(or pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.xz, if that's what you have)

The reason your build is working locally is that the build system can
find the orig.tar.gz.  On my system, after pulling the latest from
Salsa, the error is:

$ gbp buildpackage                                
gbp:info: Tarballs 'pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.gz' not found at '../tarballs/'
gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found
gbp:info: Creating /data/debian/sponsor/pat/build-area/pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.gz
gbp:error: Error creating pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.gz: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout "pat_0.12.0.orig.tar.gz": pristine-tar: no pristine-tar branch found, use "pristine-tar commit" first


Thank you,
tony

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: