[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#922847: marked as done (flxmlrpc: flaky autopkgtest)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:49:04 +0000
with message-id <E1gwoim-000Ibs-3r@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#922847: fixed in flxmlrpc 0.1.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #922847,
regarding flxmlrpc: flaky autopkgtest
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
922847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=922847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: flxmlrpc
Version: 0.1.4-4
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky

Dear maintainers,

You packages fails regularly on the ci.debian.net infrastructure without
apparent changes. Just now, it was blocking migration of pkgconf due to
a failure, but when I retrigged the test, it passed. Could you please
investigate and make your autopkgtest more robust? Please contact me if
you need help and you think I can provide that (I am not subscribed to
this bug).

Recent discussion of gating migration by autopkgtests on debian-devel
[1] noted that if this is going to work, and in particular now we are
*blocking* migration when it causes autopkgtest regressions,
intermittent autopkgtest failures are likely to have to be considered RC
due to their impact on the tested package's dependencies; for now I've
filed it as important.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/05/msg00061.html

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/flxmlrpc/1973109/log.gz

autopkgtest [03:23:58]: test helloclient: [-----------------------
+ cd test
+ make clean
rm -f *.o
rm -f HelloClient HelloServer TestBase64Client TestBase64Server
TestValues TestXml Validator
+ make
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   HelloClient.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o HelloClient
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   HelloServer.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o HelloServer
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   TestBase64Client.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o
TestBase64Client
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   TestBase64Server.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o
TestBase64Server
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   TestValues.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o TestValues
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   TestXml.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o TestXml
g++  -g -Wall -O2 `pkg-config flxmlrpc --cflags` `pkg-config flxmlrpc
--cflags`   Validator.cpp  `pkg-config flxmlrpc --libs` -o Validator
+ serverpid=840
+ trap 'rm -f out; kill 840' EXIT
+ ./HelloClient localhost 4444
+ ./HelloServer 4444
+ cat out
Error calling 'listMethods'

Error calling 'methodHelp'

Error calling 'Hello'

Error calling 'HelloName'

numbers.size() is 3
Error calling 'Sum'

Error calling 'Sum'

Error calling 'system.multicall'
+ grep -i error out
XmlRpcServer::bindAndListen: server listening on port 4444 fd 3
XmlRpcServer::work: waiting for a connection
Error calling 'listMethods'
Error calling 'methodHelp'
Error calling 'Hello'
Error calling 'HelloName'
Error calling 'Sum'
Error calling 'Sum'
Error calling 'system.multicall'
+ rm -f out
+ kill 840
autopkgtest [03:24:04]: test helloclient: -----------------------]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: flxmlrpc
Source-Version: 0.1.4-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
flxmlrpc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 922847@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> (supplier of updated flxmlrpc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:14:49 +0100
Source: flxmlrpc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Closes: 922847
Changes:
 flxmlrpc (0.1.4-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * tests: Sleep a bit to allow HelloServer to start. (Closes: #922847)
   * Add debian/gitlab-ci.yml.
Checksums-Sha1:
 cec6e91427a0a5077ae25879bd68306034276341 2090 flxmlrpc_0.1.4-5.dsc
 cabbe2dab92333ac724d01d079c8051a2749a88b 4624 flxmlrpc_0.1.4-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 7c1e30e95f0cf123ce4b510ce73ed3fb379fe7135ebb6f68d0f01ef687fb5174 2090 flxmlrpc_0.1.4-5.dsc
 be11176f518cfc6775c5a3448b569fb373c4b93e99a97799572a59f3b632643c 4624 flxmlrpc_0.1.4-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 4d31cf54edcc606b1736fd8b95230fcc 2090 libs optional flxmlrpc_0.1.4-5.dsc
 19dda69363634c69a08d36edcaf4d997 4624 libs optional flxmlrpc_0.1.4-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEXEj+YVf0kXlZcIfGTFprqxLSp64FAlxuqGUACgkQTFprqxLS
p671GBAAhGpoYEM+LNt8Jn/g1DNvhHPQWfmZSLVYuPnIaFK4z3GcTc6/KpXZt/c4
qjg5Aw+/aV5BJYc+5LQk950iUt05wE59be3CXalLSFSQD5OcmEarfGW2nQU13oPo
aigiLof4Z1GEK8kdpI+YCLk6FAgy4ONjyCm7++n25JrIv1ySr+2mgYy21qLpwg3R
AUpHXBMlVgPsZ6lru6n3Ekg7BqQZS+0u1cK1MgHMKM5rHdGRSU5JgRKqk5lsiS6p
EguZPdtpCI0SSoSppPNXrwhyrCcdN16KQZXC6LL+S8JiOdPskhy9n4eT8vAFiJld
ag0br57/ECw6qYVOjBSTU2ivQ9w+U4EuV2pV8tJV2+Ojv0YGRomKPDxg4kJI6fLI
9zp9+2kZd7bQIICgRkQBQBdkVzGQOg7y7bepmIfoao5MpUO3YRcrdfjRS66N/9eF
MBdPVwka7j6tbh1ocYYvqT+cyp+PR/5xDAcgE9fDqRF3MZrjM3LUtgy7AE3SK4IF
vQDmZLm44+Y1jnKvfhy0TgKOfYo5t7bJk8uOxIo+tzWggSG1c14tXWpTau0TzlZb
buzVLI34e8KyxfcDAiGYjz31IP5LdKSH71sTpdQn1w0+jEb0gaafVeopwo//x6/T
zqTWRRzDQSyoQ1NK97bxZKLEBL1in/RAASr09jVlK1+xKovjabs=
=Wa98
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: