Bug#485191: marked as done (acfax: FTBFS: Using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:47:02 +0000
with message-id <E1K7EIg-0005tJ-PK@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#485191: fixed in acfax 981011-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #485191,
regarding acfax: FTBFS: Using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
485191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: acfax
Version: 981011-12
Severity: important
User: schepler@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-xutils
From my pbuilder build log:
...
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
xmkmf
make: xmkmf: Command not found
make: *** [build] Error 127
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
This is due to the following change in xutils 1:7.3+11:
* Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful
for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123.
The current plan is to reintroduce the dependency for the lenny release,
then restore this change soon afterwards. At that point, this bug will
become RC.
--
Daniel Schepler
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: acfax
Source-Version: 981011-13
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
acfax, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
acfax_981011-13.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/acfax/acfax_981011-13.diff.gz
acfax_981011-13.dsc
to pool/main/a/acfax/acfax_981011-13.dsc
acfax_981011-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/acfax/acfax_981011-13_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 485191@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joop Stakenborg <pa3aba@debian.org> (supplier of updated acfax package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:21:44 +0200
Source: acfax
Binary: acfax
Architecture: source i386
Version: 981011-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joop Stakenborg <pa3aba@debian.org>
Description:
acfax - Receive faxes using your radio and sound card
Closes: 485191
Changes:
acfax (981011-13) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build-depends on xutils-dev because we need xmkmf. Closes: #485191.
Checksums-Sha1:
682f906eb5f8a754f707e6687902235f2f91ba5f 1162 acfax_981011-13.dsc
ce28139808151b1ddbc26b76979246d12d03eea6 3965 acfax_981011-13.diff.gz
afc02f2b7240a6bcb8aeab892485b8164dd53d72 36212 acfax_981011-13_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
243da47588a83c9ef16eed4e93dc69f6775ddef84d2703261d1c5a6abb14f965 1162 acfax_981011-13.dsc
33699cef036c410a1f794fc3fe6384fd85096fdf52509fa49663403afdb0f7db 3965 acfax_981011-13.diff.gz
0e81b93b6a9a561bfe33ebc502906425310699a47d61c206390ec6214e396aad 36212 acfax_981011-13_i386.deb
Files:
2f612249ab9d250bc3ec18e7b91cc1e8 1162 hamradio extra acfax_981011-13.dsc
605db239f6eda2680b17ba19cbe32bbe 3965 hamradio extra acfax_981011-13.diff.gz
9e208f3b7c3f23d81168c8b0ef91e415 36212 hamradio extra acfax_981011-13_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkhSuy8ACgkQ/CqtjGLxpX9GMgCgyQTkP/ot5WYJa2mMioP+d++7
IvUAn3wl6ESbKtw3lWR6y7zQ7M53PfCv
=IT1k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: