[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#208238: marked as done (locales: wrong charset for et_EE)



[Denis Barbier]
> The attached dpatch was used to close this bug.  But its comment is not
> accurate, this dpatch adds a et_EE.ISO-8859-15 locale (and is then
> identical to upstream fix) whereas bug log and dpatch comment seem
> to imply that et_EE charset was changed from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15.
> 
> Denis
> [2 locale-et_EE.dpatch <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> #! /bin/sh -e
> 
> # All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
> # DP: Description: List et_EE with charset ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale

I do not quite understand how you interpret "List et_EE with charset
ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale" to mean that the charset was
changed.

[GOTO Masanori]
> "Change default charset for et_EE locale from ISO-8859-1 to
> ISO-8859-15."  is acceptable?

Well, it didn't really change.  The fix accepted by upstream is to add
an extra entry for et_EE with ISO-8859-15 charset.  Ulrich didn't
accept to change the default charset.



Reply to: