Re: ldconfig annoyance

[Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:28:21PM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> 
> The ideal behaviour would be IMHO:
> 
> 1) if /lib and /usr/lib are NOT specified in /etc/ld.so.conf:
>    put these BEFORE the libs in ld.so.conf, i.e.:
> 
>    /lib
>    /usr/lib
>    ... as specified in /etc/ld.so.conf
> 
> 2) if /lib and /usr/lib ARE specified in /etc/ld.so.conf:
>    don't change anything in the order of ld.so.conf, i.e.,
>    if they come at the end in ld.so.conf, search them after
>    all other libs:
> 
>    /usr/local/lib
>    /lib
>    /usr/lib

I'll see if I can write a patch for this soon.

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'