On 24/08/16 23:39, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
what do you suggest? Should we re-introduce fonts-liberation 1.x as fonts-liberation1 package with "Breaks: fonts-liberation" (and maybe the Condensed style split out into a fonts-liberation1-sans-condensed package)?
Perhaps a fonts-liberation1 and fonts-liberation2 that "Breaks:" each other and both provide the same virtual package? Ideally the virtual package would be called fonts-liberation, but this is taken by the current non-virtual package. I do not know the cleanest way to handle a transition from a non-virtual to a virtual package. This might require the advice of an apt guru.
Splitting out the condensed (I think they call it narrow?) font might be unnecessary complexity at this stage.
Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand