Bug#486928: marked as done (Integrate with etckeeper?)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2010 00:13:47 +0100
with message-id <8b2d7b4d1003041513t168f2677r858876ebaab77458@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Package removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #486928,
regarding Integrate with etckeeper?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
486928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486928
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Integrate with etckeeper?
- From: "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:51:13 +1000
- Message-id: <20080619005104.GA5040@Clio.twb.ath.cx>
Package: etcinsvk
Version: 1.0
Severity: wishlist
There's a project called "etckeeper" that can "store /etc in git,
mercurial, or bzr". Are you aware of etckeeper, and is there a reason
there needs to be a separate package for svk, instead of simply making
it an etckeeper backend?
If so, please tag this bug "wontfix" and give the reasons.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3+rm
Package removed from Debian unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/557074
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
Reply to: