Re: booststrapping /usr-merged systems
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 at 09:40, Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> wrote:
> My takeaway here is that while I see the protective diversion as the
> "obviously superior solution", this clearly is not consensus at this
> time. It also means that when rewriting DEP 17, I need to spend quite a
> bit of text on rationale. Thank you.
I would caution to avoid interpreting clarifying questions being asked
as dissent. It's good to ask questions and clarify details about
corner cases, but I wouldn't automatically write them down as
disagreement. At least that's my reading of recent parts of this
thread.
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
Reply to: