Re: Release Notes for buster: 70-persistent-net-rules still supported?
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 11-07-2019 16:01, Justin B Rye wrote:
>> [...] But that's getting too contorted. Maybe it would be better
>> to simplify down to this:
>>
>> On systems with simple network hardware (e.g. only an <literal>eth0</literal>
>> and no <literal>eth1</literal>) the <literal>net.ifnames=0</literal> kernel
>> commandline option should also work.
>
> Shall I push this?
If you like it - I think it's a slight improvement, but I may have
been missing the point of Andrei's suggested changes.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: