[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#517014: marked as done (reference to base section)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:59:34 +0200
with message-id <20090624155934.GA15034@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#517014: reference to base section
has caused the Debian Bug report #517014,
regarding reference to base section
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
517014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517014
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.1
Severity: minor

From 2.2.6 Package priorities :

        For example, libc6, mawk, and makedev are "Priority: required"
        and "Section: base" but are not "Essential: yes".
                
But they aren't "Section: base"...
libc6 is libs, mawk is utils, and makedev is admin.

uhmm... and 'base' is not listed as a section on policy 3.8.0 (section
2.4)...

Thanks

Ruben Molina

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 24/02/09 at 22:57 -0500, Ruben Molina wrote:
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.4.1
> Severity: minor
> 
> From 2.2.6 Package priorities :
> 
>         For example, libc6, mawk, and makedev are "Priority: required"
>         and "Section: base" but are not "Essential: yes".
>                 
> But they aren't "Section: base"...
> libc6 is libs, mawk is utils, and makedev is admin.
> 
> uhmm... and 'base' is not listed as a section on policy 3.8.0 (section
> 2.4)...

Hi Ruben,

This was apparently part of Debian Reference, not of the Developers
Reference. But it also since then been fixed in the Debian Reference, so
I'm closing this bug.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

--- End Message ---
Reply to: