Re: Limited security support for Go/Rust? Re ssh3
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 04:44:14PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian GNU|Linux) wrote:
> On 1/16/24 13:56, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > >
> > > As Built-Using is for license compliance only, no?
> > >
> > > See
> > >
> > > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#additional-source-packages-used-to-build-the-binary-built-using
> >
> > Indeed, thanks for the link.
> >
>
> it seems that many people think that "Built-Using" can be used to express
> static linking (including yours truly, even though i *know* that it is meant
> for license compliance only).
>
> which makes me wonder: probably we should have an additional field that
> expresses such static linking (and therefore would trigger a rebuild when
> the dependency changes).
There's been some effort to move to a Static-Built-Using field to
express that semantic, and leave Built-Using as its intended purpose
related to licensing.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
Reply to: