[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?
To
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?
From
: "Barak A. Pearlmutter" <
bap@debian.org
>
Date
: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:34:18 +0100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CANa01B+YhUey=oFe7UJ_bm-ojkWLQLxuCq3nDWRzD2+63KATOw@mail.gmail.com
>
It is traditional to use the ancient IBM text "This page intentionally left blank"
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Barak A. Pearlmutter (on-list)
Barak A. Pearlmutter (off-list)
Prev by Date:
Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?
Next by Date:
Bug#1052404: RFP: axum -- web application framework that focuses on ergonomics and modularity
Previous by thread:
Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?
Next by thread:
Bug#1052297: ITP: node-heya-globalize -- Convert JavaScript files using UMD or AMD global
Index(es):
Date
Thread