Re: Q: How about versions/features in bookworm?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Q: How about versions/features in bookworm?
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:43:51 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] Y3JwR4MKe+aF7qsD@riva.ucam.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20221106135821.24a8d3b43165c1eaaf5c6e5e@iijmio-mail.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20221106135821.24a8d3b43165c1eaaf5c6e5e@iijmio-mail.jp>

On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 01:58:21PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>  Q3:  Does OpenSSH9.1p go into bookworm?

I just uploaded this to unstable, so barring any major unforeseen issues
I expect this to be in bookworm, yes.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)                              [cjwatson@debian.org]

Reply to:

References:
- Q: How about versions/features in bookworm?
  - From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@iijmio-mail.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: [Salsa CI] stop building dbgsym packages by default?
Next by Date: Re: Pre-Depends usage
Previous by thread: Re: Q: How about versions/features in bookworm?
Next by thread: Bug#1023539: ITP: SourceXtractorPlusPlus-- Access HMI, AIA and MDI data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread