On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Normally what a potential user needs to know is the effective licence > of the whole thing. Note that we don't even try to declare the license of *binaries we are shipping* and, unless I'm mistaken, the license of a library you are going to link against is the main (the only?) license-related thing interesting to an user. And, I suspect, we have binaries in the archive whose licenses are different from the licenses of their sources. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature