Re: systemd, again (Re: Cinnamon environment now available in testing)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 09/08/2014 at 02:05 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 11:12:01PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
>> Surely, it should be an OPT-IN choice, not an OPT-OUT one? I'm
>> talking upgrades here, not new installs.
>
> I have no clue why we are continuing to discuss this. The ctte
> resolution says that "the default init system for Linux
> architectures in jessie should be systemd". There is no extra
> provision "on new installs" in the resolution.
I suspect that the reason we're continuing to discuss this is that
different people have different individually-reasonable understandings
of what "default" means in this context. Was the question of the meaning
of that term in this context raised / addressed in the TC discussion?
I'm pretty sure at least a large fraction of the remaining disagreements
I've seen under discussion lie in conflicting understandings of that
meaning, and it looked as if the current discussion might be getting
closer to clarifying people's conflicting understandings - which can
only help, even if no official Debian position as to the meaning is
decided on.
- --
The Wanderer
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=UMhm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: