On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 15:39 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 06:56:24PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I believe all those bugs should be either reassigned to emacs23 (and soon 24) > > or just be closed with an informal message, also offering to reopen and > > reassign to emacs23/24 if applicable. [...] > > Closing them would be a disservice to our users. But it is less of a disservice than ignoring it completely. [...] > So, the natural thing to do would be to reassign them. I think the natural thing to do is to close with a message explaining how to reopen and reassign if the bug is still present in emacs24. Alternately, ask whether it is still present and then reassign/close depending on the response (or lack of response within a time limit). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part