Re: ITP: debwrap
At Sun, 02 Jan 2000 21:18:22 +0900,
Noka/Omoikane <noka@omoikane.co.jp> wrote:
> > What are you talking about?
>
> Good question but I wonder if why the wise man like you
> are not able to understand such a simple logic as below;
> 1. debconf concept may ideal but not yet implemented,
> not flexible enough, not yet fully adopted and may
> take a lot of time to reach the goal.
> 2. debwrap may have some value for a while at least til
> debconf to be completely implemented and adopted.
The best way is, as Branden says, that you'd better release debwrap
in your own apt line instead of merging into Debian, because it can
only slow down debconf adoption. This way is a better solution in both side.
> Only just the above. Understand?
I can't understand why you guys don't hack debconf to be
completely implemented and instead do waste a time to make
ugly programs. You have a freedom to hack debconf or any packages
to be more non-interactiveness. It is happier for all of us to do
such NMUs than to make the ugly. I think what you're doing
is not useful for Debian. Please improve my packages :)
----
Masato Taruishi <taruis-m@jed.uec.ac.jp> | University of Electro Communications
<taru@debian.or.jp> | Department of Computer Science
<taru@sunicom.co.jp> | Senior
http://airs.net/~taru/ | Chofu city Tokyo, JAPAN
Key fingerprint = 49 46 74 E1 8D D1 EB 56 8D CA 2A 20 14 9E A9 25
Reply to: