On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:30:10 +0200 Bas Wijnen <wijnen@debian.org> wrote: > Op 14-05-11 12:19, Evgeni Golov schreef: > >> * IIRC this was discussed at the meeting after/as i left, so could > >> someone clarify this? "Updating to the latest debhelper version > >> is considered fine". Does this mean "bump compat and dependency to > >> a supported version" or "replace with the current version in sid"? > > > > As I understood our discussion it should be the later one. > > Specifically, moving to debhelpers dh syntax is considered a good > thing unless comments in debian/rules say it isn't. > > Also, to make building packages on stable not unneccessarily hard, > moving to a version higher than that in stable is not recommended. > > Anyway, that's what I thought was the consensus. :-) Thanks for the clarification both. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature