(stupid gmail) Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> (15/07/2008): > It has to with it inasmuch that the program manages to crash whatever > portion of the display stack has been dying in those cases. This > should not happen, agreed. Still, _something_ is wrong and the root > cause lies (lay?) with supertux. It might be SDL, or X itself, etc., not necessarily supertux. It's not obvious (to me, at least) that supertux is to blame. > > But without any bugreports, that's hard to tell. > > See my last message. I know, just stating that I can't do much until then. > /me would suggest we don't drag this on idefinitely, let's keep it > friendly :) I didn't mean to be rude. Just saying fingerpointing at supertux isn't justified, yet. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature