[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libpam-x2go 0.0.1.1-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 20:32:13 +0200
Source: libpam-x2go
Binary: libpam-x2go
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0.1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Remote Maintainers <pkg-remote-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mike Gabriel <sunweaver@debian.org>
Description:
 libpam-x2go - PAM Module to check credentials against X2Go servers
Changes:
 libpam-x2go (0.0.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload to unstable.
 .
   * debian/control:
     + Set Priority: from extra to optional to comply with Debian Policy 4.1.0.
     + Bump Standards-Version: to 4.1.0.
   * debian/{control,compat}:
     + Bump DH version level to 10 (and bump B-D to >= 10).
Checksums-Sha1:
 b0f32c99e876e835bcde850cc99d2adcdd57d437 2119 libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2.dsc
 9075f625d687c0915fcccbd6f0f15b6f2a9f70c9 11368 libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 eeb26ef5feb95cfbae15160c0db589e86f23e9ca 6325 libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f01f4b20cc48780e4ba7bb60861192ebb328c89300d749b4e87c39040ec1667b 2119 libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2.dsc
 b7fb9a430742605e43d93c62c43c020dc7e93e16a928d1bb9a4560c66fcce778 11368 libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 bb33ee0ae2db1c39c93ceeabe798a62b9f0119f992643ba47e8f78da480f722f 6325 libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 bd2385c9ad86036e45abbc584197ab24 2119 misc optional libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2.dsc
 1bc6b161ce847f1e9dd801cca59ab1b9 11368 misc optional libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 978a1c9de48391a5e3b029a546b50b80 6325 misc optional libpam-x2go_0.0.1.1-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4pZJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: