[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed netbase 3.16-2 (source i386)



Installed:
netbase_3.16-2.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/netbase_3.16-2.dsc
  replacing netbase_3.16-1.dsc
netbase_3.16-2_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/netbase_3.16-2.deb
  replacing netbase_3.16-1.deb
netbase_3.16-2.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/netbase_3.16-2.diff.gz
  replacing netbase_3.16-1.diff.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 16:11:03 +1000
Source: netbase
Binary: netbase
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.16-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns <ajt@debian.org>
Description: 
 netbase    - Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
Closes: 43190 43817
Changes: 
 netbase (3.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * ifconfig: Added note to ifconfig(8) manpage about EAGAIN and IRQ
     conflicts. (Closes: Bug#43190)
 .
   * net-tools: Moved manpages from man/de_DE/manX to man/de/manX,
     etc. Should now actually let you view the non-English pages.
 .
   * ifupdown: (debian/rules) touch the various generated source files
     so that noweb isn't mistakenly required because patch doesn't
     preserve timestamps. (Closes: Bug#43817)
 .
   * init.d/inetd: Added conflicts: against xinetd's that mess with
     init.d/netbase -- they should mess with init.d/inetd instead
     now. (Reassigns Bug#43643 to xinetd)
Files: 
 256d25c59659345bec9f7d882c4e798c 681 net standard netbase_3.16-2.dsc
 ade68d0f71b976cd7c9c34dbe735e52a 90850 net standard netbase_3.16-2.diff.gz
 bb74bfe7a128137fe56e2a788e69fb8c 487258 net standard netbase_3.16-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: ascii
Comment: Key available at http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc

iQCVAwUBN8yorORRvX9xctrtAQEvrgP9GdmmXtDavFthGVIJxWg+El7J757gDf8P
EAchl6eUdzcacmtIpW82ecVGJT27Q8rf0arVBV2FRnlIvGp5NcbVjt3N7md7AYos
hvJzvjPNLH3kjA+HG9zkO1n946gfyFkbqTv/Ro4g5WHTPJUdTtUCBU7WNMsOxlKX
dOc//waMAos=
=L7lb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: