Processed: [bts-link] source package gnucash
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnucash
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #646808 (http://bugs.debian.org/646808)
> # Bug title: gnucash: least significant digits shown instead of most significant ones
> # * https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403979
> # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> # * closed upstream
> tags 646808 + fixed-upstream
Bug #646808 [gnucash] gnucash: least significant digits shown instead of most significant ones
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 646808 - status-NEW
Usertags were: status-NEW.
There are now no usertags set.
> usertags 646808 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> # remote status report for #1024136 (http://bugs.debian.org/1024136)
> # Bug title: gnucash: fails to load preferences if ~/.local/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled exists
> # * https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=798672
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> # * closed upstream
> tags 1024136 + fixed-upstream
Bug #1024136 [gnucash] gnucash: fails to load preferences if ~/.local/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled exists
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 1024136 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1024136: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024136
646808: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646808
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: