[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1060134: kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod



Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> (2024-04-26):
> On Apr 26, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> 
> > So, should I disable module utils in busybox-udeb now?
> I think so.

I haven't gotten any requests / seen any reasons to keep it; so, yes,
please feel free to remove it whenever is convenient for you.

> > Is kmod udeb ready and used in d-i already, or does it need some
> > prep first?
> AFAIK it works.

Absolutely, that's been working since the small xz-utils tweak (the udeb
addition, not the backdoor thing).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: