On 10/19/2012 09:31 AM, Nat Meysenburg wrote: > Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> writes: >> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> I like the idea of uploading the squeeze-backports package as an >>> indicator that it has been reviewed and is believed to work fine on >>> squeeze, even though it does not differ in any significant way from the >>> wheezy package. >> Nowadays I think similarly. > > I tend to agree, which is why I'm proposing this for backports. sounds reasonable to me, as does your desired feature. It looks like the new ikiwiki package has two build-dependencies that need to be satisfied by squeeze-backports: * debhelper >= 9 * libtext-markdown-discount-perl (not in squeeze at all, already in squeeze-backports) so it looks good to me. I've signed it and uploaded it to backports-master. It should show up in NEW [0] shortly. Thanks, Nat! Please give a poke on-list here if the squeeze-backports ikiwiki package needs updating (e.g. security vulnerabilities or a new version moves into wheezy for some reason) and you've got the new package ready for sponsoring. all the best, --dkg [0] http://backports-master.debian.org/dak/new.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature