Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads
- To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
- Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:04:47 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAMj1kXETEypawv7nE7KPESh4c5SNYEO+jy2dUEgfOFM+EzBKFw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <Yw+VMDk6vLMl/qwr@arm.com>
- References: <20220701135322.3025321-1-ardb@kernel.org> <Yw+VMDk6vLMl/qwr@arm.com>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 19:07, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:53:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The 32-bit ARM kernel implements fixups on behalf of user space when
> > using LDM/STM or LDRD/STRD instructions on addresses that are not 32-bit
> > aligned. This is not something that is supported by the architecture,
> > but was done anyway to increase compatibility with user space software,
> > which mostly targeted x86 at the time and did not care about aligned
> > accesses.
> >
> > This feature is one of the remaining impediments to being able to switch
> > to 64-bit kernels on 64-bit capable hardware running 32-bit user space,
> > soDocumentation/x86/boot.rst let's implement it for the arm64 compat layer as well.
> >
> > Note that the intent is to implement the exact same handling of
> > misaligned multi-word loads and stores as the 32-bit kernel does,
> > including what appears to be missing support for user space programs
> > that rely on SETEND to switch to a different byte order and back. Also,
> > like the 32-bit ARM version, we rely on the faulting address reported by
> > the CPU to infer the memory address, instead of decoding the instruction
> > fully to obtain this information.
> >
> > This implementation is taken from the 32-bit ARM tree, with all pieces
> > removed that deal with instructions other than LDRD/STRD and LDM/STM, or
> > that deal with alignment exceptions taken in kernel mode.
> >
> > Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
> > Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
> > Cc: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
> > Cc: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > Note to cc'ees: if this is something you would like to see merged,
> > please indicate so. This stuff is unlikely to get in if there are no
> > users.
> >
> > v2: - drop some obsolete comments
> > - emit a perf alignment-fault event for every handled instruction
> > - use arm64_skip_faulting_instruction() to get the correct behavior
> > wrt IT state and single step
> > - use types with correct endianness annotation (instructions are
> > always little endian on v7/v8+)
>
> It looks like that's a fairly popular request from people running 32-bit
> user on AArch64 kernels, so happy to queue it for 6.1 (if it still
> applies cleanly). I'm not too keen on code duplication but it's a lot
> more hassle to create a common decoding/emulation library to share with
> arch/arm, especially as such code is not going to change in the future.
>
> > +config COMPAT_ALIGNMENT_FIXUPS
> > + bool "Fix up misaligned multi-word loads and stores in user space"
> > + default y
>
> For consistency with ARMV8_DEPRECATED, I think we should keep this as
> default n.
>
Fair enough. I take it you can fix this up while applying?
Reply to: