Fwd: symlink problem ifort
Thanks to a couple of recipees that independently I
received from Giacomo Mulas, I recognized two mistakes
below. At the given places, one should read:
> /opt/intel/fce/9.1.036/lib
> to
> /etc/ld.so.conf
#ln -s /opt/intel/fce/9.1.036/libimf.so
/usr/lib/libimf.so
which sets the house in order.
--- Francesco Pietra <chiendarret@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:00:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: Francesco Pietra <chiendarret@yahoo.com>
> Subject: symlink problem ifort
> To: debian64 <debian-amd64@lists.debian.org>
>
> Forced to install Intel ifort on debian amd64 etch,
> I
> installed ia32-libs and used latest alien to build a
> deb package, running finally the make_deb.9e script
> found in:
>
>
http://www.theochem.uwa.edu.au/fortran/intel_on_debian
>
> (edited for "iforte" in place of "ifort" and
> "9.1.036"
> in place of "9.0")
>
> Installation in /opt/intel/fce/9.1.036 (bin, doc,
> include, lib, licenses, man, samples).
>
> At the moment I am interested in the libimf.so
> runtime
> requested by a computational program compiled
> recently
> with ifort. As installed on my system, it expects
> the
> library in /usr/lib. What I found/did:
>
> /opt/intel/fce/9.1.036/bib/lib/libmf.so
> appears as shared library. Naively I created a
> symlink:
>
> #ls -s /optintel/fce/9.1.036/bin/lib/libimf.so
> /usr/lib/libimf.so
>
> however, the properties of the link tell (Type: link
> (broken). Of course, the library is not provided to
> the application that needs it.
>
> Then I did:
>
> #updatedb
> $locate libimf.so
> /opt/intel/fce/9.1.036/lib/libimf.so
> /usr/lib/libimf.so
>
> The problem was not solved by adding
>
> /opt/intel/fce/9.1.036/bin/lib/
> to
> /etc/ld.so.conf
>
> adding to my .bashrc
> PATH="/opt/intel/fce/9.1.036/bin/:$PATH; export path
>
> rebooting and commanding
>
> #ldconfig
>
> Thank you for help.
>
> francesco pietra
> I know that a good friend of mine (of this list) is
> able to decompose rpm and recompose deb according to
> the debian rules, though this is not a taksk I could
> approach.
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
> (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures
> list.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
Reply to: