[Debconf-team] [owner@bugs.debian.org: Bug#776982 closed by Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> (reply to owner@bugs.debian.org) (Re: Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package)]
The summit.debconf.org psuedo-package has been created.
-edrz
----- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org> -----
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:03:05 +0000
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#776982 closed by Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> (reply to
owner@bugs.debian.org) (Re: Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Request
for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package)
To: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@zhevny.com>
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the bugs.debian.org package:
#776982: add summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
It has been closed by Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> (reply to owner@bugs.debian.org).
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> (reply to owner@bugs.debian.org) by
replying to this email.
--
776982: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776982
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:00:12 -0800
From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Request for
summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
To: 776982-done@bugs.debian.org
Created with the following settings:
diff --git a/pseudo-packages.description b/pseudo-packages.description
index 4296336..56f9522 100644
--- a/pseudo-packages.description
+++ b/pseudo-packages.description
@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ piuparts.debian.org Issues with the piuparts.debian.org service
sso.debian.org Problems and requests related to the Debian Single Sign On system
tracker.debian.org Issues with the Debian Package Tracker and coordination of its maintenance
d-i.debian.org Issues regarding the d-i.debian.org service and general Debian Installer tasks
+summit.debconf.org Problems and requests related to the DebConf Summit instance
diff --git a/pseudo-packages.maintainers b/pseudo-packages.maintainers
index 442d2e0..7fbe228 100644
--- a/pseudo-packages.maintainers
+++ b/pseudo-packages.maintainers
@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ piuparts.debian.org Piuparts Developers <piuparts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
sso.debian.org Debian SSO Team <debian-www@lists.debian.org>
tracker.debian.org Debian QA Team <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
d-i.debian.org Debian Installer <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
+summit.debconf.org Debconf Infrastructure Team <debconf-infra@lists.debian.org>
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
Good people are good because they've come to wisdom through failure.
We get very little wisdom from success, you know.
-- William Saroyan _My Heart's in the Highlands_
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:23:17 -0800
From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: submitter -1 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@zhevny.com>
Control: retitle -1 add summit.debconf.org psuedo-package
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package,
> summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so
> forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management
> system.
In order to create the psuedopackage, I need the
1) name of the psuedopackage
Presumably, that's "summit.debconf.org" in this case.
2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for
(suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages)
3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage who will
receive mail related to that mailing list
I also like to see an example existing bugs (or e-mails which would have
been/will be turned into bugs) which will be reassigned to this
pseudopackage once it is created. This is primarily so that I know that
the pseudopackage will be used.
Finally, I must note that the name of the psuedopackage will never be
available for a Debian package in the archive. [Given the name chosen,
that seems fine.]
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for
someone more interesting.
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: