Re: [Debconf-team] RFC: opening registration: questions for penta
>> * Food: :food_id "Am staying off-site and will provide own food"
Is there a validation rule, which checks that this option can only be
selected, if attendee is not staying at LeCamp?
>> * I am not really sure that the questions set makes it clear enough what room
>> category would the "sponsored accomodation" attendees get, but don't have a
>> good proposal on how to solve it. Also, it's not really clear that "nights"
>> include breakfast at the venue.
>
> This will be explained in the announcment mail. The idea is that
> sponsored participants can only choose this at a later stage when we've
> gather enough information for them "I accept communal" question.
I think we need to explain what it means to chose no here, otherwise
everyone will chose "no".
e.g. we replace it with a selection: communal_accomodation:
* I'd accept sponsored communal accomodation
* I'd pay to get non-communal accomodation
* I'd not come to DebConf, if only sponsored communal accomodation is provided
> I'm fine with lowering the price of camping a bit. Or are you thinking
> about also lowering the price of the communal beds? But for camping I
> think we should be explicit that there is limited availability. And that
> we don't promise anything yet. I also think this will only affect a very
> small number of persons as most of those sleeping in these "beds" will be
> sponsored.
The fee is actually CHF10/day (+CHF10 for breakfast). If we lower this
even more (e.g. make it free), I'd like to lower it also for the
communal beds. They cost the same for us and I don't think we want
people to camp just because of the price.
Removal of paid upgrade from the accomodation options:
I'm ok with removing it, if we replace it with a question about
willingness to pay (like above)
Philipp
Reply to: