Hi, (not sure if you, Stefano, prefer cc:s to the leader address or not...) On Mittwoch, 9. März 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Just a procedural comment on that. The existence of "Debian trusted > organizations" is ruled by the Debian Constitution (see §9.3). > Maintaining the list of such organization is, at present, delegated to > the Debian Auditors [1,2]. That is just to say that such a decision > cannot be taken on isolation by DebConf people. As a consequence, if you > find lighter way of dealing with that it would be probably easier for > everybody. Is it difficult to decide this within Debian? Also, does it have to become a "Debian trusted organisation" for temporarily receiving+spending money for Debian? I guess a, eg., FOSDEM booth is not a formerly trusted organisation either? And "DebConf7 Ltd" probably wasnt one, or was it? (And yes, maybe that was a mistake / something to improve now...) > I missed yesterday meeting, so it's possible this has already been > raised as a topic, but I guess DebConf has been in a very similar > situation of the present one with DebConf in Extremadura, is there no > best practice from that past experience that can be reused? For DebConf9 the legal body which handled most money things was ffis. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.